PVDaddy wrote: Altius, why was this not addressed in your original book? Why was not the benefit of re-extending the bottom arm to lower the vaulters COG mentioned? You, Kirk and others claim this to be a pull.
I am not going to be responding to PVDaddy's ridiculous claims, theories, ideas, or anything else. I no longer have the patience to explain the real world of PV to him. However, I WILL defend myself when he misquotes me.
I have NOT made any claim for 'the benefit of re-extending the bottom arm to lower the vaulters COG'!
And I have NOT claimed this so-called benefit to be a pull.
In fact, in any of my posts where I discussed the 'pull', I have never once mentioned it in the context of 're-extending the bottom arm'.
AND in fact, I have NEVER make any suggestions in any way, shape, or form that re-extending the bottom arm to lower the vaulters COG was even a benefit!
I have been completely mute on this subject, and I will remain mute. I have no intentions of sparring with PVDaddy about this issue.
Speaking of mute, I have him on MUTE, and I intend to keep him on MUTE. The only reason I'm replying in this thread is to defend myself when I'm misquoted.
PVDaddy wrote: ... you two claim I am the one who brings nothing new of value here?
I can't speak for Altius, but yes, that's exactly what I'm claiming. NONE of your ridiculous theories or ideas have any value! New? Yes. Novel? Yes. Of value? No!
If any of them ARE of value, then where's the applause from the PV community for bringing forth these new ideas?
Answer: There HASN'T been any applause, because THE IDEAS HAVE NO VALUE!
PVDADDY'S IDEAS ARE JUNK SCIENCE!
In PVDaddy's head, they may seem to have some value, but in the real world, THEY DON'T!
Someone needs a reality check here!