5-alive. should it be eliminated?

A forum to discuss anything that has to do with pole vaulting that does not fit in the other forums.

Moderators: Russ, lonpvh

Vaultref
PV Pro
Posts: 352
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 8:50 pm
Expertise: Master USATF official .. Vertical jumps specialty
Lifetime Best: zero feet

5-alive. should it be eliminated?

Unread postby Vaultref » Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:54 am

There is a discussion over on the officials page of the USATF web site where an official is proposing or trying to drum up support to eliminate the 5-alive procedure from the vertical jumps.

Personally, it shouldn't be an officials decision eliminate this. Most officials don't like 5-alive because they can't do it correctly, they become confused and screw up the sequence of jumpers. That should not be a factor in the discussion to eliminate it.

Assuming the 5-alive is properly run, what do you as jumpers and/or coaches think about this? Should it be eliminated from USATF, NFHS and NCAA rule books as a procedure to use in the vertical jumps?

Keep in mind, that the field of competitors in the VJumps can be very large at the lower heights.

Well, lets here from the ones where this matters the most.

mowad1
PV Whiz
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 1:27 am
Location: CENTRAL PA
Contact:

Unread postby mowad1 » Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:17 pm

Five alive does work if done correctly. The only problem is using it with 9 athletes. I think that the rule should read 10 or more athletes. It is confusing to someone who doesn't know the purpose of the progression, event officials should see the purpose as an advangtage to the athletes.

User avatar
lonestar
PV Lover
Posts: 1475
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 12:23 am
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Contact:

Unread postby lonestar » Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:17 pm

As a coach and a vaulter, I like it. Keeps you warm and fresh while you're competing, and doesn't allow too much time for overthinking and/or losing focus. I've even seen some meets do 3-alive, which also worked well.

As an official, it may be a little more difficult to keep track of, but we're supposed to be acting in the best interests of the athletes, so it's worth the extra attention-to-detail it requires.
Any scientist who can't explain to an eight-year-old what he is doing is a charlatan. K Vonnegut

User avatar
Scott Go Pre
PV Lover
Posts: 1146
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 3:48 pm
Expertise: Former college vaulter, and high school coach
Lifetime Best: 4.88m
Favorite Vaulter: Toby Stevenson
Location: Tallahassee, FL

Unread postby Scott Go Pre » Wed Mar 02, 2005 1:10 pm

I had one offical at reno that didn't know how to do the five alive, so I was sitting on my rear for about 20 mins just waiting for my next turn in the five. He kept adding someone in after another one would clear the height, instead of including someone after the five go round. I think that the 5-alive should not be eliminated, but officals should be taught how to go about it properly.
Rely upon God with all your heart, do not rely on your own insight. ~ Proverbs 3:5

User avatar
Aviendha
PV Pro
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 3:41 pm
Expertise: Current Collegiate Vaulter
Location: Missouri
Contact:

Unread postby Aviendha » Wed Mar 02, 2005 1:14 pm

5 alive is definitely worth it. I've been in competitions with 20+ vaulters, and if you have to sit around for 20 minutes between jumps, your muscles are gonna stiffen up, especially in the colder part of the season. And as lonestar said, 5-alive helps keep you concentrated between vaults. I believe I've also been in a couple meets where they ran 3-alive too.

I think it is definitely best for the vaulters to do 5-alive when there is a large number of vaulters (and I agree, 10 would be a good base number). I've run pv at a meet before (for becca :-) ), and did it 5-alive with no problem. I really don't think it takes that much more effort.
~Why does everyone prefer those who lie and make themselves less than they are, rather than those who embrace who they are, rejoice in it, and refuse to pretend anything less?

User avatar
CHC04Vault
PV Follower
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 7:14 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Unread postby CHC04Vault » Wed Mar 02, 2005 1:28 pm

I have never liked 5-alive, but that is only because i have never been to a meet where it is ran properly. I think ur right in sayin officals need to be trained properly in it. However, just because there are more than 10 people dosn't mean u there are goin to be 10 ppl when u start jumpin, last year everyone would be out before i would start jumpin. So it all really depends on the quality and quantity of vaulters
"Good my jump, it will be done" Bubka

User avatar
ladyvolspvcoach
PV Follower
Posts: 606
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 1:52 pm
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Contact:

5-alive

Unread postby ladyvolspvcoach » Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:51 pm

I've often officiated at local high school meets where there are 30 or more vaulters most can't jump very high. Without utilizing 5-alive it can take a VERY LONG time to go through each height. Especially when most of the kids miss on their first two jumps. Even at the collegiate level it is truely helpful in large fields of competitors. At least it minimizes the wait time between jumps.

User avatar
ashcraftpv
That one guy
Posts: 1202
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 1:06 pm
Expertise: Former College Vaulter (D1), Current High School Coach, 1999 Outdoor Big Ten Champion
Lifetime Best: 5.25m
World Record Holder?: Renaud Lavillenie
Favorite Vaulter: Jason Hinkin
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Contact:

Unread postby ashcraftpv » Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:55 pm

like everyone else says, 5 alive is great if done right. I use it when there are more than 10 kids jumping at a height. Another thing I do to speed up the comp a little is to let kids take their 2nd attempt immediately after their first miss so you more than likely won't have to move the standards again.
PoleVaultPlanet is coming.....

Skyin' Brian
PV Master
Posts: 681
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: illinois
Contact:

Unread postby Skyin' Brian » Wed Mar 02, 2005 3:07 pm

ashcraftpv wrote:like everyone else says, 5 alive is great if done right. I use it when there are more than 10 kids jumping at a height. Another thing I do to speed up the comp a little is to let kids take their 2nd attempt immediately after their first miss so you more than likely won't have to move the standards again.


ok, you are correct about the >10 kids thing, but 5-alive does not speed up a meet. as long as vaulters know that they are coming up in the order and are ready when you call their name, it will take just as long for you to go through the order. also, that whole 2nd attempt right after a first miss is sure to slow down a competition because they are more likely to use a bigger chunk of the time allotted to them on the runway since they just finished a vault, plus if it was a miss, that means that perhaps the standards do need to be changed, but time to move the standards can be almost nothing if people moving them are efficient.

to speed up a competition the best way is really to make sure that you know where an athlete wants his standards in advance of the jump, make sure that athletes will be ready when their name is called, and strictly enforce the time restraints on the runway, oh, and have someone efficient putting up the bar(probably the biggest determinant) and moving standards.

User avatar
MightyMouse
PV Follower
Posts: 578
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Syracuse, NY
Contact:

Unread postby MightyMouse » Wed Mar 02, 2005 6:10 pm

A coach in our area (who is perfectly capable of running 5 alive) told all 20 competitors before the meet, just to get on the run way when your ready to go, and tell him who you are after you jump. then he said when we were down to the last 5-6 vaulters he would have a specific order of vaulting. This offered some great benifits because it let competitors jump back on the runway after a miss, or wait and prepare for their next attempt after 5-8 vaulters have gone.

The meet went surprisingly fast and let each vaulter go at their own pace

Of course this sort of thing isnt fit for nvitational competitions, but its a great fast way to run a tri meet
19 Years Old
Coach: Val Osipenko
"Hard work never goes to waste"
Petrov/Launder student

VaultBrad
PV Whiz
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 5:54 pm
Location: Knoxville
Contact:

Unread postby VaultBrad » Wed Mar 02, 2005 6:14 pm

i like the 5-alive. it speeds up meets and reduces the time each vaulter has to wait between vaults.

User avatar
das_1971
PV Whiz
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 5:47 pm
Expertise: Former College Vaulter, bum
Lifetime Best: smthing lo
Favorite Vaulter: Don Pablo Espanol
Location: Howard, OH

Unread postby das_1971 » Wed Mar 02, 2005 6:19 pm

VaultBrad wrote:i like the 5-alive. it speeds up meets and reduces the time each vaulter has to wait between vaults.


Unless your in a very large meet, then you might wait more then an hour between jumps only to have to do all jumps at a height(if you miss) within 5 minutes.

I think that mabye the vaulters should be able to take a vote at the start of a meet it the feild is larger the 10
Ow


Return to “Pole Vault - General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests